Blog Archives

Archives for February 2018

February 27, 2018 - Comments Off on Islamabad High Court Ruled Mobile Network Shutdowns Illegal

Islamabad High Court Ruled Mobile Network Shutdowns Illegal

On February 26, 2018, Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a landmark judgement ruled mobile network shutdowns, including mobile based internet suspension, illegal. The judgment indicates that access to telecommunication services is a fundamental right of the citizens of Pakistan, and any attempt to suspend said services is a violation of their constitutional rights.

“[...] the practice adopted by the Authority to direct the mobile cellular operators to suspend its operations without prior notice or information is without lawful authority and jurisdiction;”

The court order further states that the federal government is not authorised to command suspension of mobile services without prior notice and justification, and the suspension of the operations can only be justified if the President exercises the power relating to the proclamation of an emergency, as per section 54 (3) of the Pakistan Telecommunications Act of 1996. However, the President doesn’t have the authority to independently proclaim emergency in order to suspend mobile network and services related to it.

The ruling is one of its kind, declaring suspension of mobile services unlawful and in violation of the fundamental rights of freedom of movement, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom of trade, business or profession, freedom of speech, and right to information under Article 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 19-A respectively of the Constitution of Pakistan.

“[...] the suspension of mobile phone services by the Authority is ultra vires of section 54; the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 10-A, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 19-A are violated when mobile phone users are deprived from availing the services; access to telecommunication services has become a fundamental right.”

It has been held that section 54 can only be employed under the following circumstances: “(i) war or (ii) hostilities against Pakistan by any foreign power or (iii) internal aggression or (iv) defense or security of Pakistan.” Thus “apprehensions relating to public safety, law and order or the happening of an untoward incident can by no stretch of the imagination attract section 54(2).”

The judgment of the Islamabad High Court, which can be found here, is the result of the petitions filed by Advocate Hadiya Aziz, Umer Ijaz Gilani, Mian Shafqat Jan, and Ibrar Bashir before Justice Athar Minallah.

According to Hadiya Aziz,

“It was becoming way too frequent that mobile services were suspended on the basis of mere apprehension to national security which is an infringement of the fundamental rights of customers as well as service providers. This judgment is a milestone achieved in protecting the digital rights of the citizens which are a part of human rights and basic fundamental rights of the people.”

The history of network suspension in Pakistan is particularly rich given that mobile networks have routinely been shutdown on multiple instances and occasions on account of national security or in the wake of unforeseen incidents. This history dates back to as long as the internet has been around in Pakistan - resulting in the government to take disproportionate steps to stifle the flow of information and communication for which internet has become one of the primary sources since social media have become mainstream.

In 2016, DAWN reported that Pakistan experienced six internet shutdowns between June 2015 and July 2016 which resulted in the loss of $70 million for Pakistan’s economy which is already on the brink of the cliffs. While the economic loss that results in such kinds of unfair actions is unrecoverable, it is also imperative to discuss that these measures cost citizens a great deal of inconvenience and discomfort.

This is reflective in incidents like that of March 2015 when the government of Pakistan ordered the mobile networks to be suspended within 5 kilometer radius of the Pakistan Day parade site, which affected a major hospital, an airport, and businesses near Islamabad. This is not an isolated case and certainly not first of its kind.

On occasions like religious processions and festivities, and during political upheaval, the internet was partly or, in some cases, completely suspended in attempts to control news from being delivered to the citizens - most recent example being the countrywide riots on November 22, 2017 that were stemmed from the government’s operation against Faizabad protesters in Islamabad. The authorities ordered all news channels and social media and communications platforms including Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp be suspended on both broadband and mobile based internet. This only contributed to false news being circulated among people furthering into confusion and chaos while leaving people stranded with no confirmed information at their disposal.

In June 2016, in the wake of an armed clash between Pak-Afghan forces at the Torkham border, the government, in an immoderate attempt to control information, suspended what was available of the mobile based internet in the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA). The DRF did an initial report on how this internet shutdown bars the people of FATA from seeking justice following the years of oppression and discrimination the 4.5 million residents of the semi-autonomous tribal region. Following the report, a DRF representative discussed how this internet shutdown has further affected the people of FATA on a personal level, indicating that such attempts are not just political, but also personally endangering. To this date, FATA remains disconnected from the rest of the world.

Certainly, FATA isn’t the only place that has been under internet blackout since indefinite period of time in Pakistan. In fact, parts of Balochistan have experienced routine shutdowns, including the one in effect today in Turbat. Balochistan Voices, a local news website, updates in a post that prior to the shutdown, the main source of internet for the residents of Turbat remained 3G/4G internet, but now people are only left with the internet provided by the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) whose services are unreliable due to outdated infrastructure. Whereas, Balochistan Point highlights that Kalat and other districts of Balochistan have been under internet blackout since a year.

It’s indispensable that internet shutdowns affect lives and businesses to a great extent, and as per the new ruling by IHC, they also infringe citizens’ fundamental rights enshrined under the Constitution of Pakistan. In the light of this ruling, it becomes extremely crucial to understand that the flow of information and people’s right to access information cannot and should not be affected under circumstances that can’t be justified or supported under the laws of land.

This ruling serves as a positive benchmark to grant citizens of Pakistan their constitutional right to access. And with the movement around FATA Reforms gaining momentum, it’s also important that digital rights be made part of these reforms - something that the youth of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) has been advocating for along with the demands of other fundamental and human rights.

Additionally, it is expected of the concerned government authorities to immediately restore access to mobile networks and 3G/4G internet services in the areas that have been deprived of them since indefinite period of time, particularly in FATA and areas of Balochistan.

With the advent of technology, it’s absolutely necessary that as much as we demand our rights in the offline spaces, digital rights should be made part of the mainstream discourse, so people have unrestricted access to online spaces at all times.

By Hija Kamran

February 26, 2018 - Comments Off on Demands of the Civil Society: We strongly condemn behaviour of law enforcement authorities in blasphemy case

Demands of the Civil Society: We strongly condemn behaviour of law enforcement authorities in blasphemy case

Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of law enforcement authorities in blasphemy case

  1. We as civil society organisations and concerned citizens condemn in the strongest possible terms the torture and inhumane treatment of Patras Masih and Sajid Masih by the FIA in Lahore. Not only is this a complete violation of the rights of the accused enshrined in the Constitution of Pakistan, but seriously undermines the credibility of law enforcement agencies to protect citizens.
  2. Blasphemy allegations emerged against the accused, Patras Masih, 17 years old, in Shahdara last week. Announcements were made through mosque loudspeakers identifying the accused, alleging that he shared “blasphemous content” on social media supposedly on January 16, 2018. The Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLYR) and other religious parties blocked the Shahdara intersection, incited violence against the family and demanded the arrest of Patras Masih. These threats have endangered the entire Christian community living in Dhir village in Shahdara Town, resulting in some fleeing their homes. An FIR was registered against Patras (FIR No. 174/18) on February 19 at the Shahdara Town Police Station under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code that carries a mandatory death sentence.
  3. The accused and his cousin, Sajid Masih, 24, were in the custody of the FIA at the Punjab Headquarters on February 23, 2018 when the incident in question occurred. In a sensitive and charged case of blasphemy, it was highly irregular and imprudent that, according to Pakistan Today, in addition to the complainants, members of the TLYR and other religious parties were also present at the FIA building at the time of the investigation.
  4. It has come to light that around 6:00 PM, Sajid fell off the fourth floor of the FIA building resulting in serious injuries to his head and body. The FIA initially denied that such an incident had taken place. However, it has come to light that Sajid and Patras were tortured by officers of the cyber crime wing and were coerced into sexually assaulting one another. Sajid, pleaded with them to stop. As a last resort, in order to escape the torture and sexual abuse, he jumped off the fourth floor of the FIA building, where the cyber crime wing is located. Sajid is currently in the hospital recovering from his injuries.
  5. We are seriously concerned regarding the treatment of marginalised groups by law enforcement agencies, specifically religious minorities. The state has a heightened duty to protect persecuted groups. Given the history of the blasphemy law being misused to target minority groups, it is egregious that the FIA completely failed to provide any security to the accused and the family. The law enforcement authorities have not only failed in their duty to protect minorities, but have actively participated in violence against them. The vulnerabilities of the accused were exploited by the law enforcement agency to sexually abuse and torture them. This is in direct violation of Article 14 of the Constitution and Pakistan’s international commitments under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).
  6. As concerned members of civil society and organisations working on digital/human rights, we urge the government to hold the concerned law enforcement officers accountable and take active measures to ensure that Patras Masih and Sajid Masih are given the necessary security given the nature of the accusations made against them.

Demands of the Civil Society:

We demand the Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Human Rights, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Senate Committee on Human Rights to,

  1. Immediately WITHDRAW the FIR against Sajid Masih for attempted suicide given the fact that he was attempting to escape from the physical and psychological torture and sexual abuse being inflicted on him by state agencies. Section 325 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a regressive and colonial-era law that criminalises suicide, and will soon be repealed by the Criminal Laws Amendment Bill 2017.
  2. Pursuant to the right to a fair trial enshrined under Article 10A of the Constitution, the accused must not be denied any of their civil liberties and rights. Patras and Sajid’s lawyer should be granted immediate ACCESS to the accused. Attempts to withhold their right to counsel will result in a violation of fundamental rights.
  3. Security should be PROVIDED to the accused and their family in order to prevent the real and present threat of violence. Attacks against the accused and their family are common in cases of blasphemy and specifically in this case public threats have been issued, making the possibility of violence reasonably foreseeable. The accused has already been attacked outside court where he appeared for his remand hearing on February 23, 2018. Failure of the state to provide protection will constitute willful negligence on their part.
  4. A full and independent INQUIRY of this incident should be conducted to hold the concerned law enforcement authority and officials accountable. The inquiry should be comprehensive, independent and transparent. The inquiry committee should specifically investigate the FIA officials involved for abuse of power, sexual assault and torture. Any withholding of information should be dealt with seriously.
  5. Keeping Article 14 of the Constitution and Pakistan’s international commitments under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) in consideration, law enforcement agencies should be SEVERELY PENALISED for effectuating torture against the accused. Drastic measures should be in place to ensure that such incidents are not allowed to take place again.
  6. ESTABLISH checks and balances on the abuse of power by law enforcement authorities, particularly for policing powers granted under the National Action Plan, the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act and terrorism-related legislation. The government is urged to REVIEW these powers and that the right balance is struck to ensure that there are protections in place for the accused.
  7. An independent Civil Society Steering Committee needs to be SET UP to review and check the performance of the National Response Center for Cyber Crime (NR3C), FIA. This committee should include members of civil society, technical experts and parliamentarians. The recommendations and concerns raised by the Committee should be taken into account when reviewing the progress of the FIA under section 53 of PECA and determinations of funding by the Ministry of Interior.
  8. Plans to incorporate provisions relating to blasphemy into the PECA need to be seriously RECONSIDERED given inability of the FIA to provide protection to the accused in such cases. Adding these provisions will effectively allow for the weaponization of blasphemy accusations without offsetting protections for the accused.
  9. Special PROTOCOLS to be issued for law enforcement when processing cases of blasphemy, ensuring the rights and security of the accused. Only specially trained law enforcement officers should be allowed to investigate these cases, with oversight with the Steering Committee.
  10. EFFORTS should be made to ensure that Investigating Officers and officials from minority groups are represented in law enforcement agencies. Quotas for women and minority groups need to be implemented with immediate effect and consistently across offices of the FIA.

Endorsed by:

  1. Alpha Human Rights Care Association
  2. Blackstone School of Law
  3. Bolo Bhi
  4. Cecil & Iris Chaudhry Foundation (CICF)
  5. Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS)
  6. Courting The Law
  7. Democratic Commission for Human Development (DCHD)
  8. Democratic Students’ Alliance (DSA)
  9. Digital Rights Foundation (DRF)
  10. Dove Foundation Pakistan
  11. Ending Violence against Women and Girls Alliance (EVAWG Alliance)
  12. Freedom Network
  13. Girls at Dhabas
  14. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP)
  15. Institute for Peace and Secular Studies
  16. Khwendo Kor
  17. IRADA (Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development)
  18. LAAS
  19. Media Matters for Democracy (MMFD)
  20. Minorities Rights Watch
  21. National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP)
  22. Network of Journalist for Digital Rights
  23. New Emerging Development Organization (NEDO)
  24. NET
  25. Pakhtunkhwa Ullasi Tehrik
  26. Pakistan Feminist Watch
  27. Pattan
  28. Rawadari Tehreek
  29. SATH Pakistan
  30. Shirkatgah
  31. South Asian Partnership Pakistan (SAP-PK)
  32. Takkra Qabailee Khwendy
  33. Tangh Development Society
  34. The ASR Resource Centre
  35. The Feminist Collective
  36. The Institute of Women’s Studies, Lahore
  37. The Voice Society
  38. Women United for Digital Rights
  39. Women’s Action Forum, Hyderabad
  40. Women’s Action Forum, Islamabad
  41. Women’s Action Forum, Karachi
  42. Women’s Action Forum, Lahore
  43. Women’s Action Forum, Peshawar
  44. A. H. Nayyar
  45. Adnan Ahmad Chaudhri
  46. Aila Fill, NCJP
  47. Akram Pervez
  48. Aleena Rashid
  49. Ali Kamran
  50. Amber Rahim Shamsi, Journalist
  51. Amna Mir
  52. Anam Lodhi, Journalist
  53. Anbreen Ajaib
  54. Angbeen Atif Mirza, Advocate High Court
  55. Arifa Mazhar
  56. Asad Jamal, Advocate High Court
  57. Asha Bedar
  58. Asher Bhatti
  59. Atiqa Shahid
  60. Ayra Inderyas
  61. Ayesha Khan
  62. Barrister Hassan Niazi, Law Clinic
  63. Bari Sarwar
  64. Bilal Hasan Minto, Advocate Supreme Court
  65. Bushra Gohar
  66. Daniyal Yousaf
  67. Dara Shikoh
  68. Diep Saeeda
  69. Dr. Parveen Ashraf
  70. Dr Riaz Assi
  71. Faheem Zafar
  72. Farida Shaheed
  73. Ferida Sher
  74. Farooq Bashir
  75. Fatima A. Athar
  76. Fatima Anwar, Lawyer
  77. Furhan Hussain
  78. Ghazala Afghan
  79. Haider Zafar
  80. Hamza Irshad
  81. Hiba Akbar, Advocate High Court
  82. Hija Kamran
  83. Hina Vahidy, Peace and Development Organisation
  84. Hira Saleem, Advocate High Court
  85. Hyra Basit
  86. Humaira Sheikh
  87. Iqbal Khattak, Freedom Network
  88. Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir
  89. Imran Nafees Siddiqui
  90. James Rehmat, Ecumenical Commission for Human Development
  91. Jannat Ali Kalyar, Barrister
  92. Jannat Fazal
  93. Jalila Haider
  94. Javed Akhtar, Support With Working Solution (SWWS)
  95. Jibran Nasir
  96. Joseph Francis
  97. Kashif Nemat, Advocate High Court
  98. Khadija S. Ubeid, Attorney at Law
  99. Khawar Mumtaz
  100. Kiran Nazish, Journalist
  101. Lala Hassan
  102. Lala Rukh Khan
  103. Luavut Zahid
  104. Lynette Viccaji
  105. Maham Ali
  106. Maliha Zia Lari, Lawyer
  107. Malik Faraz
  108. Maria Chaudhry
  109. Maria Rashid
  110. Marium Khalid, Advocate High Court
  111. Meera Ghani
  112. Mohammad Tehseen
  113. Muhammad Salman Khan, Queeristan
  114. Musirah Farrukh
  115. Nadeem Anthony
  116. Nadia Jamil
  117. Naeem Sadiq
  118. Naeema Malik
  119. Naheed Aziz
  120. Nasir David
  121. Nasir Saeed
  122. Nasreen Kazmi
  123. Naveed Fabian
  124. Nazia Rafique Paul
  125. Nazish Attaullah
  126. Nyla Ahsan
  127. Nighat Dad, digital rights activist/Advocate High Court
  128. Nighat Said Khan
  129. Nijah S. Khan
  130. Noor Ejaz Chaudhry, Lawyer
  131. Noreen Lehri
  132. Nosheen Abbas Kazmi, Journalist
  133. Omer Imran Malik, Associate; Mandviwalla and Zafar; CEO of Tahafuz Project
  134. Pastor Shahid M.Paul Christ Assemblies Church International
  135. Parveen Ashraf Hunzai
  136. Prof. Farkhanda Aurangzeb
  137. Ramis Sohail, Lawyer
  138. Riaz Anjum, Advocate High Court
  139. Roland deSouza
  140. Rubina Saigal
  141. Rukhsana Rashid
  142. Rukhshanda Naz
  143. Rukhshanda Naz, Advocate
  144. Rumana Husain
  145. Saadia Toor
  146. Sabrina Dawood
  147. Saddique John
  148. Sadia Bukhari
  149. Safdar Chaudhry
  150. Safina Javed
  151. Sajida Billy
  152. Sajjad Anwar
  153. Sana Mehmud
  154. Sana Saleem
  155. Sarah Zaman
  156. Sarwar Bari
  157. Seerat Khan
  158. Sehar Tariq
  159. Sehar Naveed
  160. Shaukat Ali
  161. Sheema Kermani, Tehreek e Niswan
  162. Shireen Aslam
  163. Shmyla Khan, Lawyer
  164. Sourayya Frick Azam
  165. Sumera Haq
  166. Sumaira Ashfaq
  167. Syed Ali Mehdi Zaidi, Teacher
  168. Syed Nadeem Ahmad
  169. Tahira Abdullah
  170. Tanzila Mazhar, Journalist
  171. Ujala Akram,
  172. Victoria deSouza
  173. Watson Gill
  174. Yousaf Benjamin
  175. Yousaf Mubark
  176. Zahra Khan, Thrive Pakistan
  177. Zehra Zaidi, Lawyer
  178. Ziauddin Yousafzai, UN Special Advisor on Global Education
  179. Zohra Yousaf
  180. Zoya Rehman, Researcher
  181. Zubeida Mustafa

February 25, 2018 - Comments Off on Statement: Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of LEAs in blasphemy case

Statement: Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of LEAs in blasphemy case

February 26, 2018
PRESS RELEASE

Subject: Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of law enforcement authorities in alleged blasphemy case

Civil society organisations and concerned citizens have issued a strong condemnation of the torture, inhumane treatment and sexual abuse of Patras Masih and Sajid Masih by the Cyber Crime Wing, FIA in Lahore. The statement in its entirety can be found here: https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/demands-to-the-ministry-civil-society-strongly-condemns-behaviour-of-law-enforcement-authorities-in-blasphemy-case/.

The 17 year-old accused, Patras Masih, was accused of allegedly posting blasphemous material on social media. Masih belongs to the Christian community in Shahdara, which has been under siege since the last week by the Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLYR) and other religious parties who demanded Masid be punished and incited violence against the family. These threats have endangered the entire Christian community living in Dhir village in Shahdara Town, resulting in some fleeing their homes. An FIR was registered against Patras (FIR No. 174/18) on February 19 at the Shahdara Town Police Station under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code.

On February 23, 2018,  Patras Masih and his cousin, Sajid Masih, were in the custody of the FIA at the Lahore headquarters when the abuse by law enforcement officials took place. Around 6:00 PM, Sajid fell off the fourth floor of the FIA building resulting in serious injuries to his head and body. It has come to light that Sajid and Patras were tortured by officers of the cyber crime wing and were coerced into sexually assaulting one another. Sajid, pleaded with them to stop. As a last resort, in order to escape the torture and sexual abuse, he jumped off the fourth floor of the FIA building, where the cyber crime wing is located. Sajid is currently in the hospital recovering from his injuries. Nighat Dad, Executive Director of Digital Rights Foundation, pointed out that “as a law enforcement body, it is the duty of the FIA to ensure that there are safeguards in place to ensure that the accused are accorded their rights. It is the bedrock of the criminal justice system and the FIA has failed to do so in this case.”

In a statement signed by more than 150 collectives, civil society organisations and concerned citizens serious concerns were raised regarding the treatment of marginalised groups by law enforcement agencies, specifically religious minorities. The state has a heightened duty to protect persecuted groups. Given the history of the blasphemy law being misused to target minority groups, it is egregious that the FIA completely failed to provide any security to the accused and the family. The law enforcement authorities have not only failed in their duty to protect minorities, but have actively participated in violence against them.

In a series of demands, the government has been called upon to immediately withdraw the FIR for attempted suicide against Sajid and ensure that the accused and their family are provided with effective security. Demands has also been made to conduct an independent inquiry into the matter and penalise any abuse of power by the concerned officials. The statement also calls for effective oversight of law enforcement agencies to hold them accountable and prevent abuse of power. Special protocols and procedures should be in place to deal with cases, such as blasphemy, where the lives of the accused are in danger. Lastly, the statement cautions against the proposed amendments to add blasphemy offences to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016, given the inability of the state to protect those accused under the law.

The statement has been endorsed by organisations such as Huma Rights Commission of Pakistan, Digital Rights Foundation (DRF), Bolo Bhi, National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP), South Asian Partnership Pakistan (SAP-PK), Shirkatgah, Minorities Rights Watch as well as collectives including Girls at Dhabas, Women’s Action Forum Chapters of Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Hyderabad and Peshawar, the Feminist Collective, Network of Journalists for Digital Rights and Women United for Digital Rights.

Contact Information
Nighat Dad
[email protected]

February 12, 2018 - Comments Off on Digital Rights Foundation mourns death of feminist icon Asma Jahangir

Digital Rights Foundation mourns death of feminist icon Asma Jahangir

Photo: Wolfgang Schmidt

Photo: Wolfgang Schmidt

We are shocked and saddened by the death of Pakistan’s foremost human rights activist and feminist lawyer Asma Jahangir. Her death is not just a loss for the entire country, but a personal blow for younger activists who have always looked to her as their role model and leader in trying times.

As a woman-led organisation, we are indebted to the path that Asma paved for us through Pakistan’s first women-run law firm, AGHS. As a team consisting of lawyers and young feminists, we stand on Asma’s shoulders and tread the path blazed by her.

For a women’s rights organisation, Asma has built the framework that we operate in, carved the tools that we use to assert our rights and set the standards that we strive for. Asma fought tirelessly for the right of women to chose; her exceptional  contributions are too numerous to recount. She successfully took up Saima Waheed case, which guaranteed the right of adult women to make their own choice in marriage--one of the most important cases in Pakistan’s legal history.

Asma has set the gold standard for principled stances. Her work to uphold the freedom of expression is particularly close to what we stand for and we hope to carry on her legacy. Asma stood shoulder to shoulder with us in our opposition to the draconian cyber crime bill, and having her as an ally lifted our spirits and bolstered our cause. We knew that Asma could always be counted on. We are devastated to have lost our pillar of support.

As a feminist, Asma was unapologetic in the positions she took and was unfazed by the hatred that was directed at her. Being a woman in the public eye, she was not shy of being political and did not allow herself to be weighed down by propaganda and sexist rhetoric directed at her. Asma was firm in her convictions and demonstrated lifelong commitment to the cause of democratic freedoms. She appeared in the history books at the remarkable age of 20 when she appeared in court to represent her father, Malik Ghulam Jilani, who was jailed by the military government of Yahya Khan.

Asma has always been a role model for younger feminists; a household name. While Asma, as a lawyer, a human rights activist, and as a person, is irreplaceable, we hope to replicate her resilience and courage as younger feminists stepping into these public forums.

We offer our deepest condolences to Asma’s family, friends, and all those across the world whose lives were touched by Asma’s unfettered resilience and support. It’s an end of an era, but certainly not an end of her legacy.

February 9, 2018 - Comments Off on January 2018: Big Month for Advocacy as DRF Engages with Government  

January 2018: Big Month for Advocacy as DRF Engages with Government  

DRF Submits Recommendations for Journalists Safety Bill

Senate Pakistan

Digital Rights Foundation, along with Bolo Bhi, Media Matters for Democracy, and Network of Female Journalists for Digital Rights, submitted recommendations on Journalists Safety Bill to the Senate Standing Committee on Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage. The recommendations were a step by the civil society to urge lawmakers to take the online and offline safety of female journalists into account when drafting the new legislation.

The recommendations were accepted by the standing committee and were made part of the final draft of the bill. These recommendations can be accessed here.

DRF releases new report "Digital (in)Security of Journalists in Pakistan"

DRF Report

Digital Rights Foundation has launched its new report titled "Digital (in)security of Journalists in Pakistan" which explores the levels of digital threats that journalists face, records their experiences of online insecurity, and concludes what protections they desire from the journalists community, their respective media organisations, and the government.

The report points at the appalling condition of online harassment and the sense of discomfort that journalists face while being online because of their work. It finds that 78% of the respondents of the survey had experienced some form of online threat or harassment; 92% respondents think that online harassment is really common; 45.5% of them thought that online insecurity resulted in them self-censoring themselves; and 56% of them think that online insecurity is tied with their physical safety.

In the light of some really serious stats collected form the working journalists, the DRF has put forward some recommendations that the journalists can benefit from if they are implemented in the form of policies.

The report can be accessed here.

Meeting with Interior Minister on phase 3 of the NR3C and recommendations presented by DRF

Screen Shot 2018-02-09 at 1.17.10 PM

The government is currently close to confirming funding for Phase: 3 of the NR3C project. As part of the multi-stakeholder process, DRF, along with other civil society organizations, was invited to a meeting with the Interior Ministry on January 25, 2017. Minister Ahsan Iqbal stressed on the need for virtual solutions to ensure ease of access for complainants. DRF presented its recommendations to the government regarding reforms at the FIA to ensure greater access and gender-sensitivity for complainants pursuing cases of online harassment.

Digital Rights Foundation attended PITB Roundtable Conference

Screen Shot 2018-02-09 at 2.08.07 PM

Nighat Dad and Jannat Ali of DRF attended the Punjab Board of Information Technology (PITB) round table conference held on 8th January 2018 in Lahore. Among the main agenda points the need for increasing digital literacy and reducing digital divide were also discussed.

DRF attends Provincial Conference organised by CAN Pakistan

Can Pakistan

Nighat Dad and Jannat Ali attended the Provincial Conference on “Setting the Way Forward to Ensure Child Protection in Punjab” on 5th January. It was organised by Children Advocacy Network- CAN Pakistan with the support of the Australian High Commission. The focus of the conference was to strengthen the capacities of key stakeholders engaged in dealing with children in Punjab.

DRF releases its Year in Review for 2017

Screen Shot 2018-02-09 at 1.48.42 PM

Digital Rights Foundation launches its Year in Review report for the year 2017. The report features the number of people that we've reached through our various events including workshops and conferences, the milestones that we have achieved, the reports that we have released, and the events that we have organised among other things that had our attention throughout the year 2017.

It also features a section dedicated to the Cyber Harassment Helpline, and the testimonials from some of the wonderful team members of the helpline.

With this report, our aim is to highlight the work that DRF has done, and to thank each and every one of you who supported us throughout our struggle to make online spaces safe and accessible for everyone.

We know the fight is not going to be easy, but by supporting each other, we are certain that we'll overcome every challenge that comes our way.

Access the report here.

February 2, 2018 - Comments Off on Digital Rights Foundation Launched Report: “Digital (in)Security of Journalists in Pakistan”

Digital Rights Foundation Launched Report: “Digital (in)Security of Journalists in Pakistan”

PRESS RELEASE
Digital Rights Foundation
January 2, 2018

DIGITAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION LAUNCHED REPORT: “DIGITAL (IN)SECURITY OF JOURNALISTS IN PAKISTAN”

Digital Rights Foundation (DRF) conducted a nationwide survey on the state of security of journalists to shed light on the threats and concerns journalists face online, which runs parallel to the harassment journalists face offline. This report, titled “Digital (In)Security of Journalists in Pakistan” seeks to map and understand the digital risks that journalists face in Pakistan and suggests policy interventions based on the data collected.

66% of the journalists who participated in the survey responded that they had suffered online insecurity. Journalists face issues of digital security in various ways including blackmail, hacking, threats, sexual harassment, data theft, stalking, and attacks through malware or phishing emails. The survey was divided in two parts; the first part inquired journalists’ understanding of digital security. The second part was only addressed to journalists who had experienced online threats or harassment – 68% of total respondents had faced online threats or harassment, hence proving that the majority is exposed  to online insecurity.

The second part of the survey was focused on online harassment and the gendered nature of digital insecurity. 72% of female journalists and 61% of male journalists experienced digital insecurity. When female journalists were asked how the harassment of female and male journalists differs, 71% reported that female journalists are more likely to be attacked on their appearance. Similarly, 68% of them also believe that female journalists are attacked more than male journalists on their personal lives.

In another question, we asked journalists how online insecurity affected their journalism careers. 45.5% respondents said that online insecurity resulted in self-censorship. The survey learnt that 92% of the respondents believe that online harassment in journalism is either “extremely common” or “common”. Only 8% of respondents believe that online harassment is rare or extremely rare.

This report seeks to posit recommendations to lawmakers with reference to the under-consideration Journalist Protection Bill. The first draft of the Bill did not include provisions for the digital security of journalists, thus the aim of this report is to advocate for lawmakers to also consider that journalists be protected online to keep censorship at bay, and to safeguard their mental health, quality of work, physical security of journalists and freedom of the press.

The report also found a dire need for organizations to realize the nature of this threat and for them to conduct trainings for digital security and privacy. Only 24% of the respondents  reported to have received training of digital security and privacy, and a good 76% remain unaware of the possible ways to tackle this issue.  Media organizations fail their employees in another way as 60% of the respondents admitted that their media organization has no policy to report or deal with online threats/harassment. And the 42% of the journalists who filed a complaint were given no follow up.

Federal Investigation Agency (FIA)’s National Response Centre for Cyber Crime (NR3C) has failed to make a substantial change on two counts. While the FIA set up the NR3C almost a decade ago, they have failed to disseminate information about how digital threats and crimes can be reported to them. Thus, out of all the respondents who face digital insecurity, only 9% reported their cases to the FIA. This number, again, goes to show that the cyber crime wing is hardly being used the way it was meant to be. DRF has submitted recommendations to the NR3C from a victim-based approach that include greater accessibility and complainant-friendly practices.

Digital Rights Foundation is a registered research-based advocacy non-governmental organization in Pakistan. Founded by Nighat Dad in 2012, DRF focuses on ICTs to support human rights, inclusiveness, democratic processes, and digital governance. DRF works on issues of online free speech, privacy, data protection and online violence against women. DRF has worked with several journalists through workshops to provide them with digital security tools, established a “Network of Female Journalists for Digital Security” and published a guidebook titled “Digital Security for Journalists”.

Contact person:
Nighat Dad, Executive Director, Digital Rights Foundation
[email protected]