All Posts in Blog

February 27, 2018 - Comments Off on Islamabad High Court Ruled Mobile Network Shutdowns Illegal

Islamabad High Court Ruled Mobile Network Shutdowns Illegal

On February 26, 2018, Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a landmark judgement ruled mobile network shutdowns, including mobile based internet suspension, illegal. The judgment indicates that access to telecommunication services is a fundamental right of the citizens of Pakistan, and any attempt to suspend said services is a violation of their constitutional rights.

“[...] the practice adopted by the Authority to direct the mobile cellular operators to suspend its operations without prior notice or information is without lawful authority and jurisdiction;”

The court order further states that the federal government is not authorised to command suspension of mobile services without prior notice and justification, and the suspension of the operations can only be justified if the President exercises the power relating to the proclamation of an emergency, as per section 54 (3) of the Pakistan Telecommunications Act of 1996. However, the President doesn’t have the authority to independently proclaim emergency in order to suspend mobile network and services related to it.

The ruling is one of its kind, declaring suspension of mobile services unlawful and in violation of the fundamental rights of freedom of movement, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom of trade, business or profession, freedom of speech, and right to information under Article 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 19-A respectively of the Constitution of Pakistan.

“[...] the suspension of mobile phone services by the Authority is ultra vires of section 54; the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 10-A, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 19-A are violated when mobile phone users are deprived from availing the services; access to telecommunication services has become a fundamental right.”

It has been held that section 54 can only be employed under the following circumstances: “(i) war or (ii) hostilities against Pakistan by any foreign power or (iii) internal aggression or (iv) defense or security of Pakistan.” Thus “apprehensions relating to public safety, law and order or the happening of an untoward incident can by no stretch of the imagination attract section 54(2).”

The judgment of the Islamabad High Court, which can be found here, is the result of the petitions filed by Advocate Hadiya Aziz, Umer Ijaz Gilani, Mian Shafqat Jan, and Ibrar Bashir before Justice Athar Minallah.

According to Hadiya Aziz,

“It was becoming way too frequent that mobile services were suspended on the basis of mere apprehension to national security which is an infringement of the fundamental rights of customers as well as service providers. This judgment is a milestone achieved in protecting the digital rights of the citizens which are a part of human rights and basic fundamental rights of the people.”

The history of network suspension in Pakistan is particularly rich given that mobile networks have routinely been shutdown on multiple instances and occasions on account of national security or in the wake of unforeseen incidents. This history dates back to as long as the internet has been around in Pakistan - resulting in the government to take disproportionate steps to stifle the flow of information and communication for which internet has become one of the primary sources since social media have become mainstream.

In 2016, DAWN reported that Pakistan experienced six internet shutdowns between June 2015 and July 2016 which resulted in the loss of $70 million for Pakistan’s economy which is already on the brink of the cliffs. While the economic loss that results in such kinds of unfair actions is unrecoverable, it is also imperative to discuss that these measures cost citizens a great deal of inconvenience and discomfort.

This is reflective in incidents like that of March 2015 when the government of Pakistan ordered the mobile networks to be suspended within 5 kilometer radius of the Pakistan Day parade site, which affected a major hospital, an airport, and businesses near Islamabad. This is not an isolated case and certainly not first of its kind.

On occasions like religious processions and festivities, and during political upheaval, the internet was partly or, in some cases, completely suspended in attempts to control news from being delivered to the citizens - most recent example being the countrywide riots on November 22, 2017 that were stemmed from the government’s operation against Faizabad protesters in Islamabad. The authorities ordered all news channels and social media and communications platforms including Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp be suspended on both broadband and mobile based internet. This only contributed to false news being circulated among people furthering into confusion and chaos while leaving people stranded with no confirmed information at their disposal.

In June 2016, in the wake of an armed clash between Pak-Afghan forces at the Torkham border, the government, in an immoderate attempt to control information, suspended what was available of the mobile based internet in the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA). The DRF did an initial report on how this internet shutdown bars the people of FATA from seeking justice following the years of oppression and discrimination the 4.5 million residents of the semi-autonomous tribal region. Following the report, a DRF representative discussed how this internet shutdown has further affected the people of FATA on a personal level, indicating that such attempts are not just political, but also personally endangering. To this date, FATA remains disconnected from the rest of the world.

Certainly, FATA isn’t the only place that has been under internet blackout since indefinite period of time in Pakistan. In fact, parts of Balochistan have experienced routine shutdowns, including the one in effect today in Turbat. Balochistan Voices, a local news website, updates in a post that prior to the shutdown, the main source of internet for the residents of Turbat remained 3G/4G internet, but now people are only left with the internet provided by the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) whose services are unreliable due to outdated infrastructure. Whereas, Balochistan Point highlights that Kalat and other districts of Balochistan have been under internet blackout since a year.

It’s indispensable that internet shutdowns affect lives and businesses to a great extent, and as per the new ruling by IHC, they also infringe citizens’ fundamental rights enshrined under the Constitution of Pakistan. In the light of this ruling, it becomes extremely crucial to understand that the flow of information and people’s right to access information cannot and should not be affected under circumstances that can’t be justified or supported under the laws of land.

This ruling serves as a positive benchmark to grant citizens of Pakistan their constitutional right to access. And with the movement around FATA Reforms gaining momentum, it’s also important that digital rights be made part of these reforms - something that the youth of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) has been advocating for along with the demands of other fundamental and human rights.

Additionally, it is expected of the concerned government authorities to immediately restore access to mobile networks and 3G/4G internet services in the areas that have been deprived of them since indefinite period of time, particularly in FATA and areas of Balochistan.

With the advent of technology, it’s absolutely necessary that as much as we demand our rights in the offline spaces, digital rights should be made part of the mainstream discourse, so people have unrestricted access to online spaces at all times.

By Hija Kamran

February 26, 2018 - Comments Off on Demands of the Civil Society: We strongly condemn behaviour of law enforcement authorities in blasphemy case

Demands of the Civil Society: We strongly condemn behaviour of law enforcement authorities in blasphemy case

Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of law enforcement authorities in blasphemy case

  1. We as civil society organisations and concerned citizens condemn in the strongest possible terms the torture and inhumane treatment of Patras Masih and Sajid Masih by the FIA in Lahore. Not only is this a complete violation of the rights of the accused enshrined in the Constitution of Pakistan, but seriously undermines the credibility of law enforcement agencies to protect citizens.
  2. Blasphemy allegations emerged against the accused, Patras Masih, 17 years old, in Shahdara last week. Announcements were made through mosque loudspeakers identifying the accused, alleging that he shared “blasphemous content” on social media supposedly on January 16, 2018. The Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLYR) and other religious parties blocked the Shahdara intersection, incited violence against the family and demanded the arrest of Patras Masih. These threats have endangered the entire Christian community living in Dhir village in Shahdara Town, resulting in some fleeing their homes. An FIR was registered against Patras (FIR No. 174/18) on February 19 at the Shahdara Town Police Station under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code that carries a mandatory death sentence.
  3. The accused and his cousin, Sajid Masih, 24, were in the custody of the FIA at the Punjab Headquarters on February 23, 2018 when the incident in question occurred. In a sensitive and charged case of blasphemy, it was highly irregular and imprudent that, according to Pakistan Today, in addition to the complainants, members of the TLYR and other religious parties were also present at the FIA building at the time of the investigation.
  4. It has come to light that around 6:00 PM, Sajid fell off the fourth floor of the FIA building resulting in serious injuries to his head and body. The FIA initially denied that such an incident had taken place. However, it has come to light that Sajid and Patras were tortured by officers of the cyber crime wing and were coerced into sexually assaulting one another. Sajid, pleaded with them to stop. As a last resort, in order to escape the torture and sexual abuse, he jumped off the fourth floor of the FIA building, where the cyber crime wing is located. Sajid is currently in the hospital recovering from his injuries.
  5. We are seriously concerned regarding the treatment of marginalised groups by law enforcement agencies, specifically religious minorities. The state has a heightened duty to protect persecuted groups. Given the history of the blasphemy law being misused to target minority groups, it is egregious that the FIA completely failed to provide any security to the accused and the family. The law enforcement authorities have not only failed in their duty to protect minorities, but have actively participated in violence against them. The vulnerabilities of the accused were exploited by the law enforcement agency to sexually abuse and torture them. This is in direct violation of Article 14 of the Constitution and Pakistan’s international commitments under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).
  6. As concerned members of civil society and organisations working on digital/human rights, we urge the government to hold the concerned law enforcement officers accountable and take active measures to ensure that Patras Masih and Sajid Masih are given the necessary security given the nature of the accusations made against them.

Demands of the Civil Society:

We demand the Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Human Rights, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Senate Committee on Human Rights to,

  1. Immediately WITHDRAW the FIR against Sajid Masih for attempted suicide given the fact that he was attempting to escape from the physical and psychological torture and sexual abuse being inflicted on him by state agencies. Section 325 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a regressive and colonial-era law that criminalises suicide, and will soon be repealed by the Criminal Laws Amendment Bill 2017.
  2. Pursuant to the right to a fair trial enshrined under Article 10A of the Constitution, the accused must not be denied any of their civil liberties and rights. Patras and Sajid’s lawyer should be granted immediate ACCESS to the accused. Attempts to withhold their right to counsel will result in a violation of fundamental rights.
  3. Security should be PROVIDED to the accused and their family in order to prevent the real and present threat of violence. Attacks against the accused and their family are common in cases of blasphemy and specifically in this case public threats have been issued, making the possibility of violence reasonably foreseeable. The accused has already been attacked outside court where he appeared for his remand hearing on February 23, 2018. Failure of the state to provide protection will constitute willful negligence on their part.
  4. A full and independent INQUIRY of this incident should be conducted to hold the concerned law enforcement authority and officials accountable. The inquiry should be comprehensive, independent and transparent. The inquiry committee should specifically investigate the FIA officials involved for abuse of power, sexual assault and torture. Any withholding of information should be dealt with seriously.
  5. Keeping Article 14 of the Constitution and Pakistan’s international commitments under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) in consideration, law enforcement agencies should be SEVERELY PENALISED for effectuating torture against the accused. Drastic measures should be in place to ensure that such incidents are not allowed to take place again.
  6. ESTABLISH checks and balances on the abuse of power by law enforcement authorities, particularly for policing powers granted under the National Action Plan, the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act and terrorism-related legislation. The government is urged to REVIEW these powers and that the right balance is struck to ensure that there are protections in place for the accused.
  7. An independent Civil Society Steering Committee needs to be SET UP to review and check the performance of the National Response Center for Cyber Crime (NR3C), FIA. This committee should include members of civil society, technical experts and parliamentarians. The recommendations and concerns raised by the Committee should be taken into account when reviewing the progress of the FIA under section 53 of PECA and determinations of funding by the Ministry of Interior.
  8. Plans to incorporate provisions relating to blasphemy into the PECA need to be seriously RECONSIDERED given inability of the FIA to provide protection to the accused in such cases. Adding these provisions will effectively allow for the weaponization of blasphemy accusations without offsetting protections for the accused.
  9. Special PROTOCOLS to be issued for law enforcement when processing cases of blasphemy, ensuring the rights and security of the accused. Only specially trained law enforcement officers should be allowed to investigate these cases, with oversight with the Steering Committee.
  10. EFFORTS should be made to ensure that Investigating Officers and officials from minority groups are represented in law enforcement agencies. Quotas for women and minority groups need to be implemented with immediate effect and consistently across offices of the FIA.

Endorsed by:

  1. Alpha Human Rights Care Association
  2. Blackstone School of Law
  3. Bolo Bhi
  4. Cecil & Iris Chaudhry Foundation (CICF)
  5. Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS)
  6. Courting The Law
  7. Democratic Commission for Human Development (DCHD)
  8. Democratic Students’ Alliance (DSA)
  9. Digital Rights Foundation (DRF)
  10. Dove Foundation Pakistan
  11. Ending Violence against Women and Girls Alliance (EVAWG Alliance)
  12. Freedom Network
  13. Girls at Dhabas
  14. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP)
  15. Institute for Peace and Secular Studies
  16. Khwendo Kor
  17. IRADA (Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development)
  18. LAAS
  19. Media Matters for Democracy (MMFD)
  20. Minorities Rights Watch
  21. National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP)
  22. Network of Journalist for Digital Rights
  23. New Emerging Development Organization (NEDO)
  24. NET
  25. Pakhtunkhwa Ullasi Tehrik
  26. Pakistan Feminist Watch
  27. Pattan
  28. Rawadari Tehreek
  29. SATH Pakistan
  30. Shirkatgah
  31. South Asian Partnership Pakistan (SAP-PK)
  32. Takkra Qabailee Khwendy
  33. Tangh Development Society
  34. The ASR Resource Centre
  35. The Feminist Collective
  36. The Institute of Women’s Studies, Lahore
  37. The Voice Society
  38. Women United for Digital Rights
  39. Women’s Action Forum, Hyderabad
  40. Women’s Action Forum, Islamabad
  41. Women’s Action Forum, Karachi
  42. Women’s Action Forum, Lahore
  43. Women’s Action Forum, Peshawar
  44. A. H. Nayyar
  45. Adnan Ahmad Chaudhri
  46. Aila Fill, NCJP
  47. Akram Pervez
  48. Aleena Rashid
  49. Ali Kamran
  50. Amber Rahim Shamsi, Journalist
  51. Amna Mir
  52. Anam Lodhi, Journalist
  53. Anbreen Ajaib
  54. Angbeen Atif Mirza, Advocate High Court
  55. Arifa Mazhar
  56. Asad Jamal, Advocate High Court
  57. Asha Bedar
  58. Asher Bhatti
  59. Atiqa Shahid
  60. Ayra Inderyas
  61. Ayesha Khan
  62. Barrister Hassan Niazi, Law Clinic
  63. Bari Sarwar
  64. Bilal Hasan Minto, Advocate Supreme Court
  65. Bushra Gohar
  66. Daniyal Yousaf
  67. Dara Shikoh
  68. Diep Saeeda
  69. Dr. Parveen Ashraf
  70. Dr Riaz Assi
  71. Faheem Zafar
  72. Farida Shaheed
  73. Ferida Sher
  74. Farooq Bashir
  75. Fatima A. Athar
  76. Fatima Anwar, Lawyer
  77. Furhan Hussain
  78. Ghazala Afghan
  79. Haider Zafar
  80. Hamza Irshad
  81. Hiba Akbar, Advocate High Court
  82. Hija Kamran
  83. Hina Vahidy, Peace and Development Organisation
  84. Hira Saleem, Advocate High Court
  85. Hyra Basit
  86. Humaira Sheikh
  87. Iqbal Khattak, Freedom Network
  88. Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir
  89. Imran Nafees Siddiqui
  90. James Rehmat, Ecumenical Commission for Human Development
  91. Jannat Ali Kalyar, Barrister
  92. Jannat Fazal
  93. Jalila Haider
  94. Javed Akhtar, Support With Working Solution (SWWS)
  95. Jibran Nasir
  96. Joseph Francis
  97. Kashif Nemat, Advocate High Court
  98. Khadija S. Ubeid, Attorney at Law
  99. Khawar Mumtaz
  100. Kiran Nazish, Journalist
  101. Lala Hassan
  102. Lala Rukh Khan
  103. Luavut Zahid
  104. Lynette Viccaji
  105. Maham Ali
  106. Maliha Zia Lari, Lawyer
  107. Malik Faraz
  108. Maria Chaudhry
  109. Maria Rashid
  110. Marium Khalid, Advocate High Court
  111. Meera Ghani
  112. Mohammad Tehseen
  113. Muhammad Salman Khan, Queeristan
  114. Musirah Farrukh
  115. Nadeem Anthony
  116. Nadia Jamil
  117. Naeem Sadiq
  118. Naeema Malik
  119. Naheed Aziz
  120. Nasir David
  121. Nasir Saeed
  122. Nasreen Kazmi
  123. Naveed Fabian
  124. Nazia Rafique Paul
  125. Nazish Attaullah
  126. Nyla Ahsan
  127. Nighat Dad, digital rights activist/Advocate High Court
  128. Nighat Said Khan
  129. Nijah S. Khan
  130. Noor Ejaz Chaudhry, Lawyer
  131. Noreen Lehri
  132. Nosheen Abbas Kazmi, Journalist
  133. Omer Imran Malik, Associate; Mandviwalla and Zafar; CEO of Tahafuz Project
  134. Pastor Shahid M.Paul Christ Assemblies Church International
  135. Parveen Ashraf Hunzai
  136. Prof. Farkhanda Aurangzeb
  137. Ramis Sohail, Lawyer
  138. Riaz Anjum, Advocate High Court
  139. Roland deSouza
  140. Rubina Saigal
  141. Rukhsana Rashid
  142. Rukhshanda Naz
  143. Rukhshanda Naz, Advocate
  144. Rumana Husain
  145. Saadia Toor
  146. Sabrina Dawood
  147. Saddique John
  148. Sadia Bukhari
  149. Safdar Chaudhry
  150. Safina Javed
  151. Sajida Billy
  152. Sajjad Anwar
  153. Sana Mehmud
  154. Sana Saleem
  155. Sarah Zaman
  156. Sarwar Bari
  157. Seerat Khan
  158. Sehar Tariq
  159. Sehar Naveed
  160. Shaukat Ali
  161. Sheema Kermani, Tehreek e Niswan
  162. Shireen Aslam
  163. Shmyla Khan, Lawyer
  164. Sourayya Frick Azam
  165. Sumera Haq
  166. Sumaira Ashfaq
  167. Syed Ali Mehdi Zaidi, Teacher
  168. Syed Nadeem Ahmad
  169. Tahira Abdullah
  170. Tanzila Mazhar, Journalist
  171. Ujala Akram,
  172. Victoria deSouza
  173. Watson Gill
  174. Yousaf Benjamin
  175. Yousaf Mubark
  176. Zahra Khan, Thrive Pakistan
  177. Zehra Zaidi, Lawyer
  178. Ziauddin Yousafzai, UN Special Advisor on Global Education
  179. Zohra Yousaf
  180. Zoya Rehman, Researcher
  181. Zubeida Mustafa

February 25, 2018 - Comments Off on Statement: Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of LEAs in blasphemy case

Statement: Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of LEAs in blasphemy case

February 26, 2018
PRESS RELEASE

Subject: Civil society strongly condemns behaviour of law enforcement authorities in alleged blasphemy case

Civil society organisations and concerned citizens have issued a strong condemnation of the torture, inhumane treatment and sexual abuse of Patras Masih and Sajid Masih by the Cyber Crime Wing, FIA in Lahore. The statement in its entirety can be found here: https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/demands-to-the-ministry-civil-society-strongly-condemns-behaviour-of-law-enforcement-authorities-in-blasphemy-case/.

The 17 year-old accused, Patras Masih, was accused of allegedly posting blasphemous material on social media. Masih belongs to the Christian community in Shahdara, which has been under siege since the last week by the Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLYR) and other religious parties who demanded Masid be punished and incited violence against the family. These threats have endangered the entire Christian community living in Dhir village in Shahdara Town, resulting in some fleeing their homes. An FIR was registered against Patras (FIR No. 174/18) on February 19 at the Shahdara Town Police Station under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code.

On February 23, 2018,  Patras Masih and his cousin, Sajid Masih, were in the custody of the FIA at the Lahore headquarters when the abuse by law enforcement officials took place. Around 6:00 PM, Sajid fell off the fourth floor of the FIA building resulting in serious injuries to his head and body. It has come to light that Sajid and Patras were tortured by officers of the cyber crime wing and were coerced into sexually assaulting one another. Sajid, pleaded with them to stop. As a last resort, in order to escape the torture and sexual abuse, he jumped off the fourth floor of the FIA building, where the cyber crime wing is located. Sajid is currently in the hospital recovering from his injuries. Nighat Dad, Executive Director of Digital Rights Foundation, pointed out that “as a law enforcement body, it is the duty of the FIA to ensure that there are safeguards in place to ensure that the accused are accorded their rights. It is the bedrock of the criminal justice system and the FIA has failed to do so in this case.”

In a statement signed by more than 150 collectives, civil society organisations and concerned citizens serious concerns were raised regarding the treatment of marginalised groups by law enforcement agencies, specifically religious minorities. The state has a heightened duty to protect persecuted groups. Given the history of the blasphemy law being misused to target minority groups, it is egregious that the FIA completely failed to provide any security to the accused and the family. The law enforcement authorities have not only failed in their duty to protect minorities, but have actively participated in violence against them.

In a series of demands, the government has been called upon to immediately withdraw the FIR for attempted suicide against Sajid and ensure that the accused and their family are provided with effective security. Demands has also been made to conduct an independent inquiry into the matter and penalise any abuse of power by the concerned officials. The statement also calls for effective oversight of law enforcement agencies to hold them accountable and prevent abuse of power. Special protocols and procedures should be in place to deal with cases, such as blasphemy, where the lives of the accused are in danger. Lastly, the statement cautions against the proposed amendments to add blasphemy offences to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016, given the inability of the state to protect those accused under the law.

The statement has been endorsed by organisations such as Huma Rights Commission of Pakistan, Digital Rights Foundation (DRF), Bolo Bhi, National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP), South Asian Partnership Pakistan (SAP-PK), Shirkatgah, Minorities Rights Watch as well as collectives including Girls at Dhabas, Women’s Action Forum Chapters of Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Hyderabad and Peshawar, the Feminist Collective, Network of Journalists for Digital Rights and Women United for Digital Rights.

Contact Information
Nighat Dad
nighat@digitalrightsfoundation.pk

February 12, 2018 - Comments Off on Digital Rights Foundation mourns death of feminist icon Asma Jahangir

Digital Rights Foundation mourns death of feminist icon Asma Jahangir

Photo: Wolfgang Schmidt

Photo: Wolfgang Schmidt

We are shocked and saddened by the death of Pakistan’s foremost human rights activist and feminist lawyer Asma Jahangir. Her death is not just a loss for the entire country, but a personal blow for younger activists who have always looked to her as their role model and leader in trying times.

As a woman-led organisation, we are indebted to the path that Asma paved for us through Pakistan’s first women-run law firm, AGHS. As a team consisting of lawyers and young feminists, we stand on Asma’s shoulders and tread the path blazed by her.

For a women’s rights organisation, Asma has built the framework that we operate in, carved the tools that we use to assert our rights and set the standards that we strive for. Asma fought tirelessly for the right of women to chose; her exceptional  contributions are too numerous to recount. She successfully took up Saima Waheed case, which guaranteed the right of adult women to make their own choice in marriage--one of the most important cases in Pakistan’s legal history.

Asma has set the gold standard for principled stances. Her work to uphold the freedom of expression is particularly close to what we stand for and we hope to carry on her legacy. Asma stood shoulder to shoulder with us in our opposition to the draconian cyber crime bill, and having her as an ally lifted our spirits and bolstered our cause. We knew that Asma could always be counted on. We are devastated to have lost our pillar of support.

As a feminist, Asma was unapologetic in the positions she took and was unfazed by the hatred that was directed at her. Being a woman in the public eye, she was not shy of being political and did not allow herself to be weighed down by propaganda and sexist rhetoric directed at her. Asma was firm in her convictions and demonstrated lifelong commitment to the cause of democratic freedoms. She appeared in the history books at the remarkable age of 20 when she appeared in court to represent her father, Malik Ghulam Jilani, who was jailed by the military government of Yahya Khan.

Asma has always been a role model for younger feminists; a household name. While Asma, as a lawyer, a human rights activist, and as a person, is irreplaceable, we hope to replicate her resilience and courage as younger feminists stepping into these public forums.

We offer our deepest condolences to Asma’s family, friends, and all those across the world whose lives were touched by Asma’s unfettered resilience and support. It’s an end of an era, but certainly not an end of her legacy.

February 9, 2018 - Comments Off on January 2018: Big Month for Advocacy as DRF Engages with Government  

January 2018: Big Month for Advocacy as DRF Engages with Government  

DRF Submits Recommendations for Journalists Safety Bill

Senate Pakistan

Digital Rights Foundation, along with Bolo Bhi, Media Matters for Democracy, and Network of Female Journalists for Digital Rights, submitted recommendations on Journalists Safety Bill to the Senate Standing Committee on Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage. The recommendations were a step by the civil society to urge lawmakers to take the online and offline safety of female journalists into account when drafting the new legislation.

The recommendations were accepted by the standing committee and were made part of the final draft of the bill. These recommendations can be accessed here.

DRF releases new report "Digital (in)Security of Journalists in Pakistan"

DRF Report

Digital Rights Foundation has launched its new report titled "Digital (in)security of Journalists in Pakistan" which explores the levels of digital threats that journalists face, records their experiences of online insecurity, and concludes what protections they desire from the journalists community, their respective media organisations, and the government.

The report points at the appalling condition of online harassment and the sense of discomfort that journalists face while being online because of their work. It finds that 78% of the respondents of the survey had experienced some form of online threat or harassment; 92% respondents think that online harassment is really common; 45.5% of them thought that online insecurity resulted in them self-censoring themselves; and 56% of them think that online insecurity is tied with their physical safety.

In the light of some really serious stats collected form the working journalists, the DRF has put forward some recommendations that the journalists can benefit from if they are implemented in the form of policies.

The report can be accessed here.

Meeting with Interior Minister on phase 3 of the NR3C and recommendations presented by DRF

Screen Shot 2018-02-09 at 1.17.10 PM

The government is currently close to confirming funding for Phase: 3 of the NR3C project. As part of the multi-stakeholder process, DRF, along with other civil society organizations, was invited to a meeting with the Interior Ministry on January 25, 2017. Minister Ahsan Iqbal stressed on the need for virtual solutions to ensure ease of access for complainants. DRF presented its recommendations to the government regarding reforms at the FIA to ensure greater access and gender-sensitivity for complainants pursuing cases of online harassment.

Digital Rights Foundation attended PITB Roundtable Conference

Screen Shot 2018-02-09 at 2.08.07 PM

Nighat Dad and Jannat Ali of DRF attended the Punjab Board of Information Technology (PITB) round table conference held on 8th January 2018 in Lahore. Among the main agenda points the need for increasing digital literacy and reducing digital divide were also discussed.

DRF attends Provincial Conference organised by CAN Pakistan

Can Pakistan

Nighat Dad and Jannat Ali attended the Provincial Conference on “Setting the Way Forward to Ensure Child Protection in Punjab” on 5th January. It was organised by Children Advocacy Network- CAN Pakistan with the support of the Australian High Commission. The focus of the conference was to strengthen the capacities of key stakeholders engaged in dealing with children in Punjab.

DRF releases its Year in Review for 2017

Screen Shot 2018-02-09 at 1.48.42 PM

Digital Rights Foundation launches its Year in Review report for the year 2017. The report features the number of people that we've reached through our various events including workshops and conferences, the milestones that we have achieved, the reports that we have released, and the events that we have organised among other things that had our attention throughout the year 2017.

It also features a section dedicated to the Cyber Harassment Helpline, and the testimonials from some of the wonderful team members of the helpline.

With this report, our aim is to highlight the work that DRF has done, and to thank each and every one of you who supported us throughout our struggle to make online spaces safe and accessible for everyone.

We know the fight is not going to be easy, but by supporting each other, we are certain that we'll overcome every challenge that comes our way.

Access the report here.

January 7, 2018 - Comments Off on December 2017: One Year of the Cyber Harassment Helpline Countering Online Violence

December 2017: One Year of the Cyber Harassment Helpline Countering Online Violence

The Cyber Harassment Helpline Completes its One Year

Cyber Harassment Helpline

As the Digital Rights Foundation’s Cyber Harassment Helpline completes its one year, the team compiles and releases its first one-year report. The report [PDF] contains data collected by the Helpline which highlights the nature and extent of the problem of online harassment. The Report also contains recommendations for public bodies to improve their institutional response to online harassment. Read more...

DRF Launches the Network of Female Journalists for Online Safety

Digital Rights Foundation marked the launch of their Network of Female Journalists on Online Safety on 12th December. The launch was coupled with a two-day advance training with 28 female journalists from across Pakistan.

The objective of the network is to empower female journalists to practice and promote online safety within media houses and to raise awareness regarding digital rights issues in mainstream media. Journalists were made aware about reporting on digital rights issues leading to improved quality of reporting when talking about the said rights.

The network will ensure quick and easy access to DRF’s Cyber Harassment Helpline to journalists and human rights defenders. The helpline is the first of its kind in Pakistan and provides legal advice, digital security support, and psychological counseling to the victims of cyber harassment.

DRF Presented at IGF 2017 in Geneva

IGF 2017

Digital Rights Foundation is at the Twelfth Annual Internet Governance Forum (IGF) happening in Geneva, Switzerland from 18th to 21st of December, 2017. The dynamic get-together of diverse stakeholders will discuss pressing public policy issues related to the digital world. It allows all participants to share their experiences and debate, as equals, the opportunities and challenges arising from the process of digitization. Read the details of the interventions by DRF here.

Reviewing the Right to Privacy in Pakistan

PI Conference Decemebr 2017 Blue-01

Digital Rights Foundation (DRF) and Bolo Bhi organized the “Reviewing the Right to Privacy in Pakistan Roundtable” at the Islamabad Hotel, Islamabad on Thursday, December 7th, 2017.

The goal of the roundtable was to have a comprehensive and interactive discussion with relevant stakeholders about data protection and the right to privacy in Pakistan. International and national trends and developments in regards to digital rights, freedom of expression online, and data protection measures were discussed at the event.

The conference covered the themes of data protection and privacy on the internet within the Pakistani context through participatory sessions with participants. The first panel, titled “Data Protection and the Open Government Partnership Process”, was moderated by Nighat Dad, and shed light on the commitments made by the Ministry of Information Technology (MoIT), under the Open Government Partnership (OGP) process, to introduce a data protection law in Pakistan. The panelists included Ali Mohyuddin and Ebrar Rashid from NADRA, Arzak Khan, Saad Saleem, the co-founder of Nayatel, Imran Haider from FIA, Natalia Tariq from Open Society Foundations, Saleha Zahid from Bolo Bhi, and Jannat Ali Kalyar from DRF.

The second panel, titled “The Right to Privacy through Gendered Lens”, addressed the gendered nature of the right to privacy, with particular focus on the gendered experiences of this right. The panel, moderated by Zoya Rehman, brought together a diverse set of perspectives to discuss the variations as well as overlap of the gendered nature of the privacy discourse within Pakistan. The panelists, which included Khawar Mumtaz, chairperson of NCSW, Shmyla Khan of DRF, Mehlab Jameel, Fatima Anwar from Engage Foundation, and Dr. Safieh Shah, further discussed how privacy from a gender perspective is a vital part of the larger discourse on internet rights.

#HamaraInternetKyaHai: DRF launched its campaign for 16 Days of Activism on Violence Against Women

Digital Rights Foundation has been working on women's safe access to technology since it was founded in 2012, and we always try to keep our narrative unbiased and our conversations inclusive. Some of our team members were actively involved in the drafting of the Feminist Principles of the Internet also, and implement their learning and knowledge along with these principles in our projects in Pakistan that primarily involve advocating for a feminist internet, while promoting digital security and countering online gender based violence.

With this year's 16 Days of Activism on Violence Against Women, we decided to mainstream the feminist internet discourse in Pakistan - a topic that has not been highlighted all that much here - through the hashtag #HamaraInternetKyaHai (Urdu for What is Our Internet?). Our communications team strategised and executed the campaign keeping multiple approaches in mind, making sure people understand the narrative and engage in the conversation. And we're truly glad that they did take part in the conversation through various mediums, be it by comments and tweets on social media, or via expressing their interest directly to the DRF team members, or through the Cyber Harassment Helpline that we launched in 2016 and is accessible to people via toll-free number.

Here's the breakdown of the activities that we did as part of DRF's 16 Days of Activism:

- A colourful and catchy visual that depicts inclusivity
Feminist Internet Poster

- Two Tweet Chats with DRF's team members, and wonderful feminists who advocate for a feminist internet in Pakistan. We've compiled these chats here in chronological order: https://www.scoop.it/t/16-days-of-activism-2017

- A blogpost on why does a feminist internet matter, by Fatima Athar:
https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/why-does-a-feminist-internet-matter/

- A blogpost on how harassment hinders women's access to public spaces, both online and offline - by Hyra Basit: https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/harassment-hinders-womens-access-to-public-and-online-spaces/

- We made this short and extremely powerful video depicting how women fall victim of a technological breach, and this is further used by the harassers to abuse victims and blackmail them into meeting more of their demands:

Facebook post: https://www.facebook.com/DigitalRightsFoundation/videos/976245469182682/

 

This video proved to be important in two ways in the context of Pakistan; a) a lot of people who reached out to us with a feedback on the campaign accepted that this video has helped them accept that it's not a woman's fault if someone bypasses technological loopholes and records them in their private space, where they're supposed to be feeling safe, and b) they understood that digital security is really important to be practiced. A lot of them also said that they covered their webcams after watching this video.

- And lastly, we launched completed our first year of the Cyber Harassment Helpline and released the one-year report based on our findings and experiences of operating a national level helpline that is also first of its kind. Access the report through this post: https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/the-cyber-harassment-helpline-completes-one-year-of-its-operations/

Content Regulation in the Digital Age – DRF’s Submission to the Human Rights Council Report 2018

On December 20th, 2017, Digital Rights Foundation submitted its response to the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the upcoming study, “Content Regulation in the Digital Age” as part of the June 2018 Human Rights Council Report.

This submission is a precursor to DRF’s future plans to investigate the role of the private sector in regulating Pakistan’s online spaces, and sets the background for further advocacy revolving around online content regulation in Pakistan, while observing how this largely falls under the ambit of the government. Read more...

Consultation Meeting with Trust for Democratic Education and Accountability (TDEA)

Trust for democratic education and Accountability held an orientation consultation on Promoting the Human Rights And Electoral Participation of People with Disabilities (PWD), Transgender people and women in Pakistan on 12th till 14th of December 2017. The meeting brought together human rights defenders from all over the country to discuss inclusiveness in elections and the role of the civil society organizations.

DRF and TDEA Signed a Memorandum of Understanding

DRF and TDEA  signed an MOU to increase inclusiveness and capacities of people with disabilities (pwd), transgender people and women in the upcoming elections. DRF became one of the founding members of Coalition for Inclusive Pakistan (CIP).

Orientation Meeting with TDEA

DRF and TDEA conducted a small consultation meeting on 20th of December 2017 with women from diverse backgrounds to discuss about the importance of voting and the legal rights women have in Pakistan. Through the consultation women identified the problems they face while contesting for elections and voting and what needs to be done by the election commission and political parties to make the political environment better.

Session at the Punjab Revenue Authority

Representatives from DRF delivered an interactive session at the Punjab Revenue Authority (PRA) with their young interns on digital rights, online harassment and using the internet as a tool to hold government officials accountable. DRF also conducted interactive exercises to help students harass the internet for awareness-raising and dissemination of information.

Online Violence Against Women in Pakistan - Submission to UNSR on Violence Against Women

Submission to UNSR on VAW

Digital Rights Foundation submitted its response to the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women. This report explores the laws and institutions that are in place within Pakistan to deal with issues of online violence against women. Facts and figures are used to gauge the extent of the problem and its nature, relying on data provided by the government, law enforcement agencies and collected by DRF. A legal analysis of the legislation ise accompanied by an appraisal of the implementation of the laws and the functioning of institutions on the ground. Reported judgments are analysed to gauge jurisprudence (interpretations of the laws) as well as legal principles developed by local courts. The purpose of the report is not only to analyse the existing structures, but to situate them within the lived experiences of women facing online violence. This experience is elucidated through case studies as well as analysis done by DRF’s cyber harassment helpline team.

We hope that this submission will provide a sufficient overview of the regulatory and social landscape in Pakistan with relation to online violence against women. The report can be accessed here.

December 21, 2017 - Comments Off on Content Regulation in the Digital Age – DRF’s Submission to the Human Rights Council Report 2018

Content Regulation in the Digital Age – DRF’s Submission to the Human Rights Council Report 2018

On December 20th, 2017, Digital Rights Foundation submitted its response to the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, for the upcoming study, “Content Regulation in the Digital Age” as part of the June 2018 Human Rights Council Report.

This submission is a precursor to DRF’s future plans to investigate the role of the private sector in regulating Pakistan’s online spaces, and sets the background for further advocacy revolving around online content regulation in Pakistan, while observing how this largely falls under the ambit of the government. Private sector regulation of online content is at present a by-product of the state regulatory regime.

DRF’s submission details the laws and regulations established by the Pakistani government, which must be followed by ISPs and private companies. As with other nations of the Global South, the current political climate informs internet policy-making in Pakistan, with security concerns superseding fundamental human rights, in particular the rights of the general internet user and citizen. This is a situation that is exacerbated by the lack of substantial collaborations, if any, between the private sector, civil society and other relevant stakeholders, and the government.

What we are calling for through this submission, therefore, is a re-evaluation of the approach towards online content regulation by policy-makers in Pakistan, in order to uphold the right to freedom of expression -- as per the international human rights framework -- and ensure increased transparency and accountability on and for online platforms in Pakistan.

DRF examined the legislative framework that guides and underpins content regulation in Pakistan, and the problems associated with it, as can be encapsulated by the visible increase in internet censorship, takedowns and content filtration in Pakistan, as well as the prohibition of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and encryption mechanisms. The submission further discusses the existing processes developed by companies, both overseas and locally, to ensure adherence to Pakistan’s current content regulation regime, including the role of telecommunications companies operating within the country.

What our findings demonstrate is that in recent years the Government of Pakistan has established a strict regulatory regime for online spaces under the auspices of an overarching and all-encompassing security narrative, with various state institutions intervening on special occasions and particular topics. Conditions set under Article 19 of the Constitution of Pakistan have been interpreted broadly to enact vague criminal laws with draconian penalties, with those overly broad interpretations seeping into the government’s approach to online spaces as well.

DRF’s submission can be found here, and we hope that other stakeholders will benefit from it as well.

Written by Zoya Rehman, Jannat Ali Kalyar and Adnan Ahmad Chaudhri

December 20, 2017 - Comments Off on The Cyber Harassment Helpline Completes One Year of its Operations

The Cyber Harassment Helpline Completes One Year of its Operations

As the Digital Rights Foundation’s Cyber Harassment Helpline completes its one year, the team compiles and releases its first one-year report. The report [PDF] contains data collected by the Helpline which highlights the nature and extent of the problem of online harassment. The Report also contains recommendations for public bodies to improve their institutional response to online harassment.

Cyber Harassment Helpline

The Cyber Harassment Helpline was launched on December 1, 2016 and is Pakistan’s first dedicated helpline addressing issues of online abuse and violence by providing a free, safe, gender-sensitive and confidential service. It provides legal advice, digital security support and psychological counselling to victims of online harassment. The toll free number [0800-39393] is available during 9am to 5pm.  Nighat Dad, the founder and Executive Director of DRF, explained that “the Helpline aims to fill the gaps of service delivery to complainants and victims of online harassment--to do what law enforcement and other organisations cannot--while paying special heed to gender-sensitivity and mental health."

This report marks the one-year milestone of the Helpline. During its first year, the Helpline has received 1,551 complaints in the form of calls, emails and Facebook messages from December 1, 2016 till November 30, 2017. The Helpline has so far received a total 1476 calls on its toll-free number. The Helpline was originally only operational on the weekdays, however in August, it was expanded to seven days a week to meet the needs of its callers. This has resulted in an increase in the average number of monthly calls from 82 in the first six months to 123 by November.

67% of the calls at the Helpline were by women, whereas 33% of the callers were men. Facebook remains the most widely reported platform, with 45% of callers experiencing harassment there. Among the kinds of harassment reported, complaints of fake profiles, non-consensual use of information, blackmailing, and unsolicited messages were the most common ones.

The Helpline has strict privacy and confidentiality policies in place, and only non-personally identifiable information is collected from our callers with informed consent. While 19% of the callers did not want to disclose their location, we were able to identify that most of our callers on the Helpline were from Punjab (50%). The Helpline also received calls from Sindh (18%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (5%), Balochistan (2%), Azad Kashmir and FATA (1%) and the Federal Capital, Islamabad (5%).

Building on this data, the Digital Rights Foundation has put forward some recommendations for the government and law enforcement agencies to improve the reporting mechanism regarding cyber harassment. There is an urgent need to build the technical and financial capacity of the National Response Center for Cyber Crime (NR3C), FIA to deal with complaints in a timely and satisfactory manner. The Investigation Officers (IOs) and Prosecutors need to be trained in cyber crime law, internet governance, criminal procedure and trauma counselling. The FIA is also urged to fulfil its obligation under section 53 of the Prevention Electronic Crimes Act 2016 to submit reports to Parliament and ensure that this report is public. We recommend that the FIA forms a separate desk for addressing online harassment with female IOs and gender-sensitisation training. Lastly, the FIA is urged put in place case management and tracking systems to ensure an accessible complaint registration procedure and effective follow-up on cases.

December 18, 2017 - Comments Off on Digital Rights Foundation is at the Twelfth Annual Internet Governance Forum, 2017

Digital Rights Foundation is at the Twelfth Annual Internet Governance Forum, 2017

Digital Rights Foundation is at the Twelfth Annual Internet Governance Forum (IGF) happening in Geneva, Switzerland from 18th to 21st of December, 2017. The dynamic get-together of diverse stakeholders will discuss pressing public policy issues related to the digital world. It allows all participants to share their experiences and debate, as equals, the opportunities and challenges arising from the process of digitization.

Find Nighat Dad, the Executive Director of Digital Rights Foundation, at the IGF organising and speaking at some of the very interesting sessions which include,

Surveillance from the Margins

December 19, 2017 | 11:00 am - 12:00 noon | Room XXII - E United Nations Office at Geneva
Organiser: Digital Rights Foundation

Surveillance is not a uniform experience, be it surveillance by the state, companies or social actors. The gendered nature of surveillance and the different forms it takes given the positionality of the person experiencing it is particularly glaring when experienced by members of a particular gender or a marginalised community. Sometimes surveillance is discriminatory per se, in that it is directed specifically at people because of their gender, race, class, disability, sexual orientation, etc. For instance, phishing attacks experienced human rights activists or offline and on-the- ground-surveillance of journalists covering controversial topics. In other instances, facially non-discriminatory surveillance is experienced differently by certain individuals
because of their marginality and positionality through the disparate impact that it has. It is the second form of surveillance that is often left undiscussed and the intersectionality of race, class, gender, religion, sexual orientation and ability is unexamined.

The purpose of this panel comprising of people from diverse backgrounds, is not only to map and understand the diversified experiences of surveillance but to take these findings regarding the diffused nature of surveillance and work towards actively finding solutions to the particular kinds of surveillance experienced by marginalised groups. The aim of the discussion will also be mainstream discourse from the margins at a global level.

Moderator: Alexandrine Pirlot de Corbion

Speakers:

  • Nighat Dad
  • Ankhi Das
  • Lisa Garcia
  • Joana Varon
  • Amalia Toledo

The impact of digitisation on politics, public trust, and democracy

December 19, 2017 | 10:00 am - 13:00 pm CET | Main Hall - Room XVII - E United Nations Office at Geneva
High Level Session of the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2017

The digital space, as a cornerstone of the public policy space, can be a great enabler for democratic discourse and participation, as well as inclusive policy-making. At the same time, the misuse of the digital public policy space can lead to the distortion of truth, mistrust in public information, and misrepresentation of public opinion.

This session will discuss both the opportunities and the challenges that digitisation brings to the digital political sphere, the public trust, and democracy. Discussions will revolve around ways of strengthening the benefits of democratic participation and inclusion via digital means, limiting the negative impact of the misuse of the public policy space, and rebuilding trust among online users.

The session will also address the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders. It will look at issues such as government policies aimed at creating more inclusive policy-making processes through the use of digital tools, the responsibility of Internet intermediaries for the dissemination of fake news and false news that can influence political processes, and the elements that can help rebuild trust among users. Also, the session will discuss the role of media actors in a democracy and the implications of the ongoing structural change in the media ecosystem. Most importantly, the session will look into whether and how digital literacy, education, and awareness-raising could be the key towards empowering citizens not only to take advantage of digital tools, but also to deal with the challenges related to the misuse of the digital public space.

‘Good stories’, ‘bad stories’, and lessons learnt will be explored as part of the discussions.

Host Chair: Mr. Philipp Metzger, Director General, Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM)
Moderator: Ms. Nathalie Ducommun, Talk Master of Swiss Television RTS
Remote Moderator: Ms. Katharina Hoene, DiploFoundation

Speakers:
The roundtable will include the following speakers:
• Ms. Nighat Dad, Executive Director, Digital Rights Foundation, Pakistan*
• Mr. Bobby Duffy, Global Director, Ipsos Social Research Institute*
• Ms. Kareen Jabre, Director of Programmes, Inter-Parliamentary Union*
• Ms. Malavika Jayaram, Executive Director, Digital Asia Hub*
• Mr. Frank La Rue, Assistant Director-General Communication & Information, UNESCO*
• Ms. Dunja Mijatovic, former OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media*
• Mr. Gonzalo Navarro, Executive Director, Asociación Latinoamericana de Internet*
• Mr. Jean Paul Philippot, President, European Broadcasting Union*
• Ms. Snežana Samardžić-Marković, Director General of Democracy, Council of Europe*
• Ms. Nanjira Sambuli, Digital Equality Advocacy Manager, World Wide Web Foundation*
• Mr. Sébastien Soriano, Chairman, National Regulatory Authority for Telecoms and
Posts, France*
• Mr. Robert Strayer, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Cyber and International
Communications and Information Policy, U.S. Department of State*

Combating Online Violence Against Politically-Active Women

December 19, 2017 | 3:00 - 4:30 PM CET | Room XXII - E United Nations Office at Geneva
Organiser: National Democratic Institute (NDI)

This is a multi-sector panel discussion about strategies for understanding and combating online violence against politically-active women. Online harassment of politically-active women is one form of the global problem of violence against women in politics (VAW-P), and can result in women choosing not to participate in leadership or political debates, and ultimately not to express their opinion. The resulting limitation of both the number of women able to participate and the range of issues discussed poses a fundamental challenge to democracy, progress towards gender equality and women’s empowerment, as well as to the integrity of the information space.

The panel will engage experts from multiple sectors including digital activism, women's empowerment, technology, and international governance, to discuss methods for building international understanding of this issue and identifying strategies for combating it.

Moderator: Sandra Pepera, Director, Gender, Women and Democracy, National Democratic Institute (NDI)

Speakers:
Nighat Dad - Executive Director, Digital Rights Foundation
David Kaye - UNSR Freedom of Expression
Seyi Akiwowo - Elected politician in East London, and Founder of Glitch! UK
Nathan Mathias - Postdoc computational social scientist at Princeton University
departments of Psychology, Sociology, and Center for Information Technology Policy

November 30, 2017 - Comments Off on Harassment hinders women’s access to public and online spaces

Harassment hinders women’s access to public and online spaces

Working on the Cyber Harassment Helpline for exactly a year now, we’ve come across a range of cases, but there’s one thing that has really stood out as common among most of the cases. Not just one, not even a dozen, but most of the victims of online harassment who have reached out for help have reported that one of their immediate responses was to deactivate their online accounts. It becomes important to note here that the people who sought this solution as temporary relief were mostly, if not all, women. When backing away from online spaces is seen as the obvious and immediate recourse in the face of harassment, whether it’s blackmail, impersonation, stolen and/or edited pictures, and when most of the victims of harassment are women, it tells you not only that there is an imbalance of representation and participation of women in online spaces, but that there is a lack of alternate support and help available for them as well.

The online realm is only a reflection of the physical realm, and it shows. In Pakistan, the presence of women is restricted to specific areas in public and online spaces both. The habits and norms of the physical society are replicated within online spaces, so the abuse that women face is only made easier to spew from behind a device’s screen. Harassment faced online, however, has additional deep repercussions on the presence and identity of women physically. There is a certain element of danger that comes along with the ease of accessibility and broadcast that the internet provides. Perhaps the basic threat behind most forms of online harassment is that what a person considers the most personal and vulnerable aspect of themselves has the potential to be made public - and once information is on the internet, it is difficult to be optimistic about it not spreading like wildfire. The threat of possible public embarrassment and social condemnation leaves the victim with what they consider to be the easiest solution to the problem: backing away from the online world. That threat is sometimes powerful enough for them to partially withdraw from physical spaces such as schools, workplaces, markets and parks, even family gatherings, either taking the decision themselves to do so, or being forced by someone from within their family and/or friends.

But if there’s anything that the recent incidents of women (and men) coming out and speaking up against their harassers and abusers in the West has shown us, it is that there is no shame with being harassed when it is someone else who is committing a crime. Any forced ‘shame’ or ‘embarrassment’ that one is made to feel as a result of facing harassment can be overcome by the support and encouragement of everyone else. Drawing up a circle of support can encourage women to maintain their position in both the online and public spaces, instead of feeling like their only refuge is to wipe away their online identity.

A person who is harassed or abused in online and/or offline spaces often indulges in self-loathing and the guilt obscures their will to communicate with people and in expecting support from them. This self-blame results in more serious consequences stemming from psychological trauma. In such instances, the onus comes on people around the victim to extend support to them, and make use of the available sources of help starting from making sure the victim doesn't blame themselves for the abuse they were subjected to.

Author: Hyra Basit