All Posts in #IHC

March 5, 2026 - Comments Off on IHC judge fears negative outcome from livestreaming court cases

IHC judge fears negative outcome from livestreaming court cases

A judge from Islamabad High Court has observed “very negative outcomes” from the live streaming of certain court proceedings, and raises concerns over the impact of broadcasting judicial hearings. These remarks were made when while hearing a petition in court, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani noticed a person recording the hearing on their mobile phone, an act which is prohibited under Pakistani court rules. He further noted that when notable cases from superior courts are broadcast live, such as the PTI party symbol case, they are prone to generating political controversy and discourse. 

March 2, 2026 - Comments Off on IHC bench hearing appeals for Imaan and Hadi dissolved

IHC bench hearing appeals for Imaan and Hadi dissolved

Islamabad High Court (IHC) has dissolved the bench hearing appeals filed by human rights lawyers Imaan Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali against their conviction in the controversial social media post case. While hearing an application seeking an early hearing for the appeals, Justice Muhammad Asif ordered the court to place the case file before Chief Justice Dogar and to form a new bench for the hearing. The appellants argued that despite earlier proceedings, no effective hearing date has been set. 

 

February 19, 2026 - Comments Off on IHC Issues Notices to NCCIA on Appeals Against PECA Conviction in Tweets Case

IHC Issues Notices to NCCIA on Appeals Against PECA Conviction in Tweets Case

The Islamabad High Court issued notices to the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency on appeals filed by lawyer couple Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha against their conviction in the controversial tweets case under PECA. The court also sought a response on their applications for suspension of sentence and adjourned proceedings. The couple were sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment in January, with the case drawing criticism from international rights bodies over due process and freedom of expression concerns.

 

February 9, 2026 - Comments Off on IHC questions the definition of ‘fake news’ in PECA

IHC questions the definition of ‘fake news’ in PECA

Islamabad High Court Justice Minhas has raised critical questions about how ‘fake news’ will be defined and enforced under the amended Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA). The amendments, challenged by journalists and other media bodies, are argued to undermine freedom of expression and vest excessive authority in the executive. Justice Minhas has sought clarification on who decides whether information is fake and how proceedings in a case like this would begin, highlighting the vagueness in the law. 

February 7, 2026 - Comments Off on Imaan Mazari and husband move IHC against conviction

Imaan Mazari and husband move IHC against conviction

Lawyers Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali have filed separate criminal appeals in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) to overturn their conviction in the social media posts case. They seek to have their verdict from January 24 declared null and void arguing that it was issued in violation of legal and procedural norms. The couple, sentenced to a combined 17 years in prison, say that the trial court lacked jurisdiction and that their right to a fair trial was undermined. Claims of custodial torture were at arrest were also raised.

September 18, 2025 - Comments Off on IHC Suspends Order Removing PTA Chairman Hafeezur Rehman

IHC Suspends Order Removing PTA Chairman Hafeezur Rehman

A division bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has suspended an earlier ruling that ordered the removal of retired Major-General Hafeezur Rehman from his position as Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) chairman.

The bench, comprising Justices Muhammad Asif and Inaam Ameen Minhas, heard Rehman’s intra-court appeal against the order issued by Justice Babar Sattar, who had declared his appointment “unconstitutional, illegal and void ab initio” in a case filed by digital rights activist Usama Khilji.

During the hearing, Additional Attorney General Salman Mansoor argued that Justice Sattar had granted relief not even sought in the petition, without issuing a notice to the attorney general, which he said was required under Article 199 of the Constitution. Advocate Qasim Wadud, representing Rehman, contended that the rules had been amended and approved by the federal cabinet prior to the appointment.

Justice Sattar’s earlier ruling had noted that the PTA Appointment Rules were amended in May 2023 to accommodate the appointment, while the job advertisement was issued in March 2023 when no such post legally existed. The court observed the recruitment process “suffered from malice in law,” with a higher age limit set specifically to favour Rehman, and declared the appointment illegal and unsustainable.

The suspension of that order now allows Hafeezur Rehman to continue as PTA chairman pending further proceedings.

July 8, 2025 - Comments Off on IHC seeks proposals from journalist bodies during Peca petition hearings

IHC seeks proposals from journalist bodies during Peca petition hearings

 https://www.dawn.com/news/1922702/peca-plea-journalists-input-sought-by-ihc-on-social-media-regulation

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) is reviewing petitions filed by journalist groups including the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, Islamabad High Court Journalists Association, and senior anchor Hamid Mir challenging the 2025 amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA). Under Justice Raja I. Ameen Minhas, the court asked these bodies to submit proposals aimed at regulating social media and scrutinizing the legal frameworks used to combat fake and defamatory content. The hearing opened with detailed arguments from PFUJ’s counsel, tracing the evolution of PECA from its original 2016 version to the newly introduced provisions such as establishing a Social Media Complaints Council that petitioners allege threaten freedom of expression and press independence. The petitioners raised serious concerns over the amendments, calling them a threat to free speech.